Monday, October 31, 2005
Yes, but is it funny?
Reminder on Medicare webcast
Budget cuts, with AARP reaction
Friday, October 28, 2005
Higher retirement ages in Europe?
Joe Volz, unretiree extraordinaire
By Joe Volz
RETIRING AND RETIRING AND RETIRING
I retired in 1987. And again in 1997. And in 2000.
Now, I am working full-time and have no immediate plans to quit.
Perhaps, I represent a new wave of seniors—call us "unretirees," if you wish.
I don’t need the money. But I enjoy what I do although I now do it my way.
I have been a newspaper reporter for 45 years and now I am a full-time columnist but without the perks that my younger colleagues in the columnizing business have. I don’t get health insurance or a pension from my current employer, Copley News Service, where, an independent contractor, I write a weekly syndicated column called "Aging Lifestyles."
(I am sure that word, aging" along with "senior citizens" and "elderly" will be on the banned list of words that Paul Kleyman and the gang at the American Society on---dare we say it--Aging are drawing up.)
Anyhow, I don’t need those benefits. I get them from one of previous employers, AARP. ( I worked there when it was called the American Association of Retired Persons).
Yes, our vocabulary is changing as well as our role in the work force.
The first time I retired I was a Washington correspondent for the financially-ailing New York Daily News. The paper, then owned by the Chicago Tribune, was trying to downsize before selling it. They offered us senior employees a buyout. They would pay me two years’ pay not to work there. I had been covering the Mafia. I knew an offer I couldn’t refuse.
I figured I would do a little freelancing but, before long, I was recruited by a new news service, Maturity News Service, then syndicated by the New York Times. I traveled the country interviewing, among others, retirees for 10 years. But the news service folded.
Yet, I took another full-time job so I could buy a fancy condo in Washington. I went to work for the American Psychological Association as a magazine writer but soon decided I really wanted to be retired . I didn’t want to commute to the office every day on a regular schedule.
But now I work at home—when I want to.
I vowed, after my third retirement, that I would never wear a necktie again nor would I wear socks most of the time. I have kept that promise.
As an independent contractor, I have to pay more Social Security but the tax people let me write off all sorts of expenses. And just to keep busy, I have taken another job, once again as an independent contractor. I write a three-times-a –week column on anything I like for the local daily in Frederick, Md.
So, maybe we need a new word for retirees, too. I suspect there are a lot of people like me who keep working under new self-imposed ground rules.
You can call me anything you like. Just don’t call me a white elephant.
Thursday, October 27, 2005
Census on Computer and Internet Use
This is out today. If you click on the web link, you can download files that show age breakdowns and a lot more. For example, only about 35 percent of people over age 65 have a computer in house, but boomers, as you might expect, are higher -- in 60s to 70s, depending on age. Here's intro to release: "Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2003 -- A new report from the U.S. Census Bureau shows that 40 percent of adults used the Internet to obtain news, weather or sports information in 2003, a sharp increase from only 7 percent six years earlier. In a measure of how interpersonal communications are changing, more than half of adults (55 percent) used e-mail or instant messaging in 2003, a dramatic increase from the 12 percent who did so in 1997. The report also shows the Internet has become an integral part of the economy. In 2003, nearly half (47 percent) of adults used the Internet to find information on products or services. About one-third (32 percent) actually purchased a product or service online, compared with only 2 percent of adults who shopped online in 1997. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/computer.html"
Wednesday, October 26, 2005
Home care quality measures
Someone a little more savvy than I probably could find some nuggets in this, just over on PR Newswire. (Note: The NQF has members from a wide variety of health care groups, businesses and consumers.) "WASHINGTON, Oct. 26 /PRNewswire/ -- The National Quality Forum (NQF) today announced publication of a new set of national consensus standards for home care. National Voluntary Consensus Standards for Home Health Care provides a set of standardized performance measures, to facilitate comparison of the quality of home health care providers. The Executive Summary of the report, with a list of endorsed performance measures and their specifications, can be found on the NQF web site, http://www.qualityforum.org.
Hey, You, Get Off of My ... Mercedes?
Tuesday, October 25, 2005
Latest edition of Age Beat Online (10-25)
IN THIS ISSUE: A tip of the hat to Rosa Parks-everyone to the front of the bus!
1. WILL "WEST WING" PLAY THE AGE CARD?
2. WILL THE ABO LANGUAGE SURVEY TRUMP THE AGE CARD?
3. "AGE BEATLES NEWS": Time's Barlett and Steele Expose "The Broken Promise" of American Pensions; USA Today Series on Aging This Week; New Cleveland Plain Dealer Column on Medicare Part D
4. ON THE ABO BLOG THIS WEEK (Plus a Half-Million Wasted Years)
5. THE CALENDAR: Medicare Part D Webcast, Nov. 1
6. "LARKIN'S LINKS": Elders Get Their Wishes, Too, Amy Grant!
Webcast of Medicare roundtable
This just moved: "The Association of Health Care Journalists (AHCJ) and the Kaiser Family Foundation will host an interactive roundtable for reporters on Medicare and its new prescription drug benefit. The roundtable discussion will be webcast live on Tuesday, November 1, 2005, at 1:00 p.m. E.T., and viewers can ask questions by phone and email."
USA Today on aging
Monday, October 24, 2005
New study on heart attack death rates
New Medicare rule on some mobility equipment
Age Beat Online takes language survey
HOW ABOUT THEM BOOMERS? The last JEoA survey on media uses of language was in 1997. What has changed since then is that the boomers are eight years older, and more within the age-beat sphere than ever. For the first time, in the year 2005, a majority of boomers edged past 50. And in January 2006, the first boomers will turn 60. So what will become the terms of art for the ageless generation—and for their longevous parents? This concern especially animated the JEoA meeting during the 2005 ASA-NCOA Joint Conference in Philadelphia, and we decided to see what ABO readers have to say. And with the increasing interest in the age boom, we decided to use your responses as the basis of a guide for all reporters. This will not be written in granite but will be a working document open to discussion and updating over time.
Please take a few minutes by our OCT. 31 DEADLINE (Halloween) to answer the short list of questions below. Just paste the survey below in an email and send to Paul Kleyman.
Thank you for participating,
Paul Kleyman, Editor, Age Beat Online
Steve Slon, Editor, AARP the Magazine
WORDS SURVEY QUESTIONS:
1. In the past year, have you participated in a discussion about terms preferred or not preferred for middle-aged or older people? Yes / No: ______
Indicate which entity or entities you discussed this with: colleagues at your news organizations, colleagues elsewhere in journalism, friends, family members, members of your audience.
2. What one or two terms for midlife or older people do your readers or audience members seem to prefer to others?
3. What one or two terms do you use for midlife or older people do your readers or audience members seem to dislike the most?
4. In the past two years has any reader/audience member formally or informally objected to a term or terms your news organization has applied to middle-aged or older people?
If so, briefly note the word or phrase in question and note the nature of the objection.
5a. FOR STAFF JOURNALISTS ONLY: Does your news organization include references to preferred usage of terms related to the age of those in articles in its official style sheet? Please recall these rules and quote them if you can.
5b. FOR FREELANCERS: Have you had to heed style variations among your clients? Yes / No: _______
Briefly cite key differences among them in preferred or abjured terminology, and note whether the media outlet was national or local/regional (names of outlets are optional).
6. Have you noted any words or phrases that indirectly convey positive or negative connotations or stereotypes related to aging, such as “feisty?” What are these words and usages?
Have you or your news organization noted (or plan to note in the coming year) these connotative or stereotyping words in its style guide or acted in any way to avoid such usages in your copy or that of the news outlet? Yes / No: ___
Comments:
7. Briefly, please add any observations comments about what journalists should consider in their word choices about age.
8. If you could recommend one word to replace ‘senior’ in the journalism vocabulary, it would be ___________. ” (If you don’t have a problem with “senior,” please indicate this.
9. If you could recommend one word to replace “boomer” or “baby boomer” in the journalism vocabulary, it would be ___________. ” (If you don’t have a problem with “senior,” please indicate this.)
10. Please add any additional comments you would like to offer.